Table 1. Large Comparative Studies of AZT and Acyclovir

Randomized, Double-Blind

Reference Population N AZT Acyclovir Follow-up Survival Outcome
Cooper et al., 1993 AIDS, median CD4 33 (AZT), 30 (combo) 131 250 mg 4X daily 800 mg 4X daily up to 1 year One year estimated survival was 0.73 vs 0.54, P = 0.014*

ARC, median CD4 166 (AZT), 193 (combo) 134 250 mg 4X daily 800 mg 4X daily up to 1 year One year estimated survival was 0.97 vs 0.81, P = 0.045*
Youle et al., 1994 CDC stage IV disease, median CD4 6 (open), 41 (combo) 302 open label therapy 800 mg 4X daily means: 259 d (open), 274 d (combo) 43 deaths (open) vs. 27 deaths (combo). Estimated 1 year mortality probability 0.39 vs 0.23, P = 0.018. In Cox model RH was 0.54 (combo/open), P = 0.013.
Saag et al., submitted Early symptomatic, CD4 >200 767 100 mg 6X daily 800 mg 6X daily up to 96 weeks Death rate too low for analysis (3 deaths on AZT and 1 on combo)
Analysis of Observational Data

Stein et al., 1994 Starting AZT prior to development of AIDS, mean CD4 319 to 369 786 open label therapy median 600-800 mg in the HIV indication group up to 6 years, median 3 years In the time-dependent, intent-to-treat Cox model, ACV any indication RH = 0.74, P=0.07; ACV HIV indication RH = 0.64, P = 0.01. Estimated length of additional time to 90% survival between 154-210 d. No dose effect. Survival associated with longer uninterrupted therapy and initiation post-AIDS diagnosis.

*After adjustment in the Cox model for baseline prognostic variables, the relative hazard was 0.52, P = 0.057.ACV = acyclovir, RH = relative hazard