From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. HIV/AIDS Clinical Care>
  4. Antiretroviral Rounds

Should We Mess with Success?

Should the regimens be changed for three patients who have undetectable viral loads and normal or near-normal CD4-cell counts and are tolerating their treatments well?

Three patients present for regular outpatient care. As described below, all have stable HIV disease, with undetectable viral loads and normal or near-normal CD4-cell counts. None has experienced virologic failure on any treatment or has a known history of drug resistance. All are without adverse effects on their current regimens.

This week, we ask for your opinion. Next week, we will present the opinions of three experts.

Patient 1 is a 50-year-old man who has been taking abacavir, 3TC, and efavirenz since 2001. He has no renal disease but does have hyperlipidemia (well controlled with atorvastatin). His father died of a myocardial infarction at age 48.

Patient 2 is a 63-year-old man who has been taking efavirenz and lopinavir/ritonavir since 2002. While on an earlier regimen — d4T, 3TC, and indinavir — he developed a severe neuropathy, which left him with residual numbness and tingling in his feet. He now needs to go on an inhaled corticosteroid to treat increasingly refractory asthma.

Patient 3 is a 35-year-old woman who has been taking abacavir, 3TC, and twice-daily ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir since starting this regimen in a clinical trial 5 years ago. Each week, she misses about two afternoon doses of the boosted fosamprenavir.

TELL US WHAT YOU WOULD DO

For each patient, would you switch or alter the current regimen? If yes, to what — and why? Submit your comments below.

Note: The expert opinions have now been published.

Published in AIDS Clinical Care June 29, 2009

Reader Remarks:

Read all Reader Remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

(more...)

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.